Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools

Case Status: Resolved

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Mr. Perez’ favor in a 9-0 decision. You can read the decision here.

Case filed (started): Dec. 2017

Main Concern

Students with disabilities who have nothing more to gain from the IDEA’s administrative process should be able to pursue relief in federal court, like money damages, that is available under the ADA and not available under the IDEA.

Summary

Miguel is a person who is deaf. In 2017, DRM attorneys helped Miguel file a case in administrative court, seeking relief under the ADA and the IDEA for Sturgis Public Schools’ failure to provide Miguel with a qualified sign language interpreter for 12 years. After receiving Miguel’s complaint, the administrative court first dismissed the ADA claim, and then later, Sturgis Public Schools and Miguel settled the IDEA claim. Miguel then filed suit in federal court, seeking money damages under the ADA for his past harm. Money damages are not available for violations of the IDEA, but they are available for violations of the ADA.

The federal court dismissed Miguel’s ADA claim for failure to seek remedies for his IDEA claims in the administrative court all the way through an administrative hearing. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision, even though Miguel had received complete relief for his IDEA claims and his ADA claim, seeking money damages not available under IDEA, was previously dismissed . The Supreme Court reversed the dismissal of Mr. Perez’ ADA claim. The case will now return to the federal district court for the Western District of Michigan, where Mr. Perez will have the chance to prove his ADA claim.

Outcome

In April 2023, the case returned to the district court. On remand, Parties were able to settle the case, resulting in a dismissal of the case in October 2023. As of April 2026, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Luna Perez v. Sturgis has been cited in 197 court opinions throughout the country.